![]() the one i want is like $5k :( so a 1k discount would be very nice. Ahead of the launch of high-end MacBook Pro models, Geekbench scores of M2 Max chips have appeared online which reveal slightly faster performance than the. Xbench going from a 1.0 GHz G4 to a 2.0 GHz G5 doesnt make it obvious that theres been a change in the baseline score. Plus all the issues there might be with hardware and plugins not working.Īlso, maybe the m1 ultra mac studio could be much discounted once the new one comes out. When Macworld changed their baseline between MacBench 5 and 6, they changed the scale from 100 to 1000, which made it immediately obvious that results couldnt be compared. Im waiting for the next generation mac studio just to make sure it doesnt flop like the trashcan or the upgrade cycle is so fast id should wait until the new ones comes out. In my main user account, my xbench scores around a 13 on the hard drive section. Compared to the Late-2008 MacBook and MacBook Pro, the Geekbench results are unsurprising: the Air still comes in third with an overall score of 2467 in the 64-bit tests, compared to its chunkier siblings at 3170 for the MacBook and 3664 for the Pro. Which is similar to current mac pro intel where the single core is fast but its specialty is the multicore. The mac pro seems it will have double the max or ultra in cores and might be m2 based on rumors and info. Xeons where expensive.Īfter buying a very expensive i9 macbook to have it be a jet plane in noise level and an oven in heat level, itll be a while until id say an intel cpu is worth it no matter the cpu speed. ![]() Score: 114.08-Powermac G5 2 x 2.5Ghz, 2gb RAM, Maxtor 160gb HD, 9600XT, 10.4.7 Xbench Link here 2 piako HardGawd Joined Messages 1,613 The overall scoring system is a little inconsistent. With that said, seeing other threads about m1 ultra vs max where most composers seem very happy with the power of max and some saying ultra is overkill maybe its ok that these are not as fast as AMD/intel in the high end but still offer great perfromance and heat performance for most tasks.Īpple didnt ever really playball in the top performing cpu vs windows and mostly had good performance for most pros and its prices where about the same once someone build a comparable multicore pc outside i7. I find it is best if you run the test a bunch of times as it seems to get better. And how it compares with m1 single core it does seem true how m2 only about 11% better to m1. To my surprise, the overall xbench score was at merely 60.37 A friend of mine has the previous version of the 15.4' MBP (not Santa Rosa). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |